Comments on: What Investors Can Expect If Negative Gearing Gets Scrapped https://www.propertyinvesting.com/what-investors-can-expect-if-negative-gearing-gets-scrapped/?infuse=1 Wed, 05 Nov 2025 11:21:38 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jason Staggers https://www.propertyinvesting.com/what-investors-can-expect-if-negative-gearing-gets-scrapped/#comment-321430 Sun, 06 Mar 2016 23:25:44 +0000 https://www.propertyinvesting.com/?p=5020642#comment-321430 Hi Mal. That’s definitely a worst case scenario, but possible. Bear in mind with foreclosures however, the banks will be watching the market closely and may choose not to foreclose if it will do more harm to their books than good. About 15% of all homes in the USA still have negative equity. I recently spoke to a homeowner in the States who hasn’t made a mortgage payment in 3 years and the bank still hasn’t foreclosed.

]]>
By: Mal https://www.propertyinvesting.com/what-investors-can-expect-if-negative-gearing-gets-scrapped/#comment-321368 Sat, 05 Mar 2016 07:55:17 +0000 https://www.propertyinvesting.com/?p=5020642#comment-321368 Looking at this debate, I can see problems on the horizon, which, from what I have been able to view, no one has picked up on.

The C.G.T., if it is curtailed and only applied from July 2017 to newly built dwellings, I can see that prices prior to July 2017 will be on a rocket, going upwards. Everyone will want to get into the market. My hope is that the lenders do not make loans easily available at this time. After June 2017, will the prices for housing hold, rise or fall? Look back to the G.S.T., introduced in July 2000. Prior to that date, everyone wanted everything delivered or invoiced prior to June 30. After that date, things died but slowly resumed to a similar pace to prior the introduction.

People that are in the market at that time that are forced to sell, that miss out on the June 30 deadline may get stuck with property they can not sell, so they drop the price to encourage someone to buy the property. This starts driving property prices down. Imagine a glut of property which no one wants to buy and buyers are dictating the price they are happy to part with their money. The glut of units in inner Melbourne about 10 – 12 years ago springs to mind. Foreign investors buying in units could get a double whammy due to movement in the AU$ against their native currency and the fall in value, bearing in mind the spruikers are often inflating the price well over the true market value.

With property, and I will stand corrected on what I am about to say: You go and borrow to buy a property. Pay $500K, borrow $400K. What happens in the event where there is a major correction in the market in the first say, 5 years, and prices drop by say, 35%? Is there not a clause in the mortgage contract which specifies that you have to have positive equity in your property? If this happens, and the prices fall, what is going to happen? It will start as a trickle of foreclosures, which, the financers, caught with property, will look to sell at fire sale prices. This drives the prices around that home downwards. This could then expose other occupiers and or investors to foreclosure due to negative equity. State and local governments will suffer due to reduced capital costs, but, they will increase the rates to counter that problem! As the rate of foreclosed homes increases, this could do a couple of things. Either hold the rents at current levels, or cause the rents to drop. Rents could increase due to renters being kicked out due to foreclosure and stock removed from the market. What is the standing on a valid rental contract in the case of foreclosure?

There is also the matter of income to property value. At this time, many places are way out of reach for the person working on basic incomes. Even with 2 incomes, it is still minimal chance of getting into a home. While the property prices are high, this favours the lenders, realtors and governments. Should they fall, it may make for affordable home ownership, but, what damage is going to be done to the lenders and governments primarily, and the real estate industry secondly?

Apologies for being so negative, and, I am hoping like hell that this does not play out here, but, from what I have been able to view, minimal respondents to the forums have thought past the basic idea and thought through the end game, so to speak. My request to people is to think things through from many angles and to look at multiple outcomes that may happen. My understanding is that it is called “Due Diligence”.

]]>
By: Jason Staggers https://www.propertyinvesting.com/what-investors-can-expect-if-negative-gearing-gets-scrapped/#comment-320538 Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:45:47 +0000 https://www.propertyinvesting.com/?p=5020642#comment-320538 …unless of course the two-thirds of Australians who own homes realise that they actually do have a vested interest.

]]>
By: Jason Staggers https://www.propertyinvesting.com/what-investors-can-expect-if-negative-gearing-gets-scrapped/#comment-320472 Sun, 28 Feb 2016 23:51:15 +0000 https://www.propertyinvesting.com/?p=5020642#comment-320472 Turnbull recently said something similar: http://tinyurl.com/jzg2gqk

]]>
By: DeanCollins https://www.propertyinvesting.com/what-investors-can-expect-if-negative-gearing-gets-scrapped/#comment-320459 Sun, 28 Feb 2016 16:56:42 +0000 https://www.propertyinvesting.com/?p=5020642#comment-320459 This could work out to be a good thing for investors you know….

eg. ROI will increase.

Note I said ROI and NOT “rent”, almost everyone says Rents will increase but its probably a mix of rents will go up BUT also property prices will fall.

Basically this will allow you to purchase MORE investment properties in comparison to the number of hours you need to work FOR that dollar amount.

I also agree with the comment above….its a stupid idea for the govt and it will result in less stamp duty revenue…..but hey it will get them votes and that’s all that matter to politicians.

Keep in mind however that although you wont be able to declare against your current income…..you will still be able to declare against future income.

Eg. my wife and I own investment property in Sydney but live/work overseas (higher earning potential per hour worked).
Currently we choose to run our investments at a slight loss (eg cumulative its always between -2,000 to -10,000pa) anytime we are about to run a profit we leverage and go buy another property kicking it to somewhere back around a 10k loss.

My point being and a lot of people don’t realize this is that as an expat we CANT negatively gear today (basically this makes the whole -ve argument moot for us). What happens is we lodge Australian taxes and this loss carries forward. Our thinking is that in 20 years from now when we retire back in Australia…..it will probably take us 10 years or so before we have to pay any actually tax income as we ‘pay down’ the carried losses.

The same thing will happen with your rental properties, loss on the investment carried forward until rent increases OR you pay down the principle enough to pay down the income covers outgoing.

Consider it ‘delayed savings’, in the mean time the cost to purchase your next investment property went down 10% and your rents went up slightly :)

]]>
By: Don https://www.propertyinvesting.com/what-investors-can-expect-if-negative-gearing-gets-scrapped/#comment-320455 Sun, 28 Feb 2016 02:16:23 +0000 https://www.propertyinvesting.com/?p=5020642#comment-320455 The Property Council of Australia is running a petition to lobby the politicians to keep their hands off the current negative gearing arrangement. You can sign the petition here

http://dontplaywithproperty.org.au/?utm_source=search&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=ngfeb

]]>
By: Jason Staggers https://www.propertyinvesting.com/what-investors-can-expect-if-negative-gearing-gets-scrapped/#comment-320395 Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:31:58 +0000 https://www.propertyinvesting.com/?p=5020642#comment-320395 There is indeed a lot of power resting with those who want to keep propping up real estate values, not the least of which the RBA and banks. But less than 10 percent of the population has a vested interest in negative gearing. If the other 90+ percent of voters start blaming the unaffordability of housing on tax concessions for the “rich,” then the future may not be like the present. I wouldn’t exactly say that as a nation we’re moving away from an entitlement mentality. We may see power increasingly shift toward politicians who promise the most wealth redistribution.

]]>
By: Tom https://www.propertyinvesting.com/what-investors-can-expect-if-negative-gearing-gets-scrapped/#comment-320389 Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:40:01 +0000 https://www.propertyinvesting.com/?p=5020642#comment-320389 It doesn’t matter anyway because Labor wont get in – Shorten is way less popular than Kim Beazley and he couldn’t make it. This idea helps people who already vote Labor anyway. Once the election is out of the way the govt will tinker with NG slightly to look like they have done something fair. Turnbull has shown he is a jellyfish (with GST) so there wont be any real reform . Remember Keating the reformer? He’s retired folks. Theres too many people with a vested interest keeping property inflated so no real changes will happen.

]]>
By: Jason Staggers https://www.propertyinvesting.com/what-investors-can-expect-if-negative-gearing-gets-scrapped/#comment-320356 Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:55:43 +0000 https://www.propertyinvesting.com/?p=5020642#comment-320356 Good points.

One thing I will say… The deeper we go into a fiscal hole, the more government will find ways to increase revenue. Requiring CGT on personal residences is not out of the realm of probability.

]]>
By: Bruce Dossel https://www.propertyinvesting.com/what-investors-can-expect-if-negative-gearing-gets-scrapped/#comment-320336 Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:32:34 +0000 https://www.propertyinvesting.com/?p=5020642#comment-320336 This is good.
1. Rents will have to increase because you can no longer claim interest as a tax deduction. It will also effect depreciation. So Add interest and depreciation lost plus about 2 % over interest as a loss in profits and claim this as an increase.

2. Quaranteen or accumulate all losses to be used against future profits or capital gains tax. This way future profits and capital gains tax can be reduced.

3. need to go to bank to borrow for losses. This will increase costs for sale.

4. If purchase more than 3 properties you can seek permission from the tax office not to be treated as a rental investor but as a business. As a business you will then be entitled to claim losses against other business income. Plus depreciation is calculated differently for businesses. Depreciation is calculated not on original cost price of the building BUT on the price you purchased the asset for. You cannot claim it as a deprerciation of a home but as a investment asset.

5. Now you can make arrangements with seller and the bank to buy the asset under a Hire Purchase contract. Under a hire purchase contract say of 5 to 10 years, you are entitled to claim hire or rental charges as a tax deduction. This will mean cost of land and building and everything else is written off over 5 to 10 years.

Please check all the above with accountants and tax agents. This is what I have been told works. If it is so. Please inform me as I will buy 3 or 4 investment assets as a business and get massive writeoffs against business profits.

]]>